The Salty Barrister

The two weeks that encompass the Christmas and New Year holidays always seem to pass with frightening speed. One moment someone's leaning into your office with holiday wishes, and the next thing, your secretary is cheerily reminding you that your letter has the wrong date: "It's 2010 now, John." So it is.

You say what you want about progress, I like the nautical bubble because things seem to take a little longer to change. And that's a good thing. Take the past decade, for instance. Oh, I know the marketers will sling this and that as heralding "marked" change, but really? The things that count to me seem pretty much unchanged. There's still wooden hulls being pushed along under acres of sail, good looking small craft, harbors that'll hold an anchor, moorings and launch service, floating docks, Saturday races, bags of ice, grills on transom rails, tan lines, sailing lessons, your wake's white curl, a boater's friendly wave, rafting up for the concert, the rumble of twin engines, an open line of ocean, moonlit cruises, high tides, the smell of varnish . . . .

I didn't write a holiday post. I'll let my earlier Thanksgiving post stand for the Season.

Underway and making way.

--- JKF

Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

My sister is a professor at a university here in the Northeast. She lets me come around once a semester and talk to her oceanography students about maritime law-like things. It's hard to condense maritime law into a fifty-minute or so period; so, what I end up doing is the ol' shotgun approach.

We hit topics that I think might keep a college-aged brain interested. I talk about salvage (peril, voluntariness and success), chatter on about the differences between the territorial sea and the exclusive economic zone (one's your backyard and the other's kind of like the neighborhood), meander around some causes of action available to an injured crewmember (Jones Act and Unseaworthiness), and usually close by addressing whether a captain can actually perform a marriage aboard a vessel (mixed law; statute says no go, but some case law suggests otherwise).

When you're lawyering, a lot of what you say is measured in favor of the advocacy of your position. What I get to do once a semester before a bunch of college kids is a refreshing change. Think of it as the difference between an employer's Christmas party, and having a drink with friends.

Alright, we'll get a couple of more posts in before the Holidays. Speaking of holidays, take a look at Captain Doug's recent blog post on The Daily Breeze? That's the way to do it, friends. Christmas in Staniel Cay, Bahamas. One of these days I plan to do the very same thing, snow and sleighs be damned!

Underway and making way.

--- JKF

Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

So last night, I hosted Captain Skip Strong at our Newport, RI office. There's not many folks who can hold an audience for nearly an hour and half, but he did so with ease. I suspect it's a good sea story delivered by a great storyteller that did the trick. Many thanks to those that joined us and for those that didn't or couldn't, keep a look out for my announcement of the Spring speaker who brings an equally compelling narrative of high seas adventure.

So Skip's tale is about the salvage of NASA's $50 Million dollar liquid fuel cell back in the mid-nineties. He was the captain of a single-skin tanker that came to the aid of a tug towing a barge on which the fuel cell was loaded. Navigating in shallow water off the Atlantic coast of Florida, Skip and his crew managed to hook up and tow the tug and barge. Parted lines, twenty-foot seas and the unavailability of outside assistance makes it pretty easy to envision the harrowing scenario. At any rate, he wrote a book about the event called "In Peril" and it's the kind of read that'll keep you up far past your bedtime.

I'll get back to scribbling some more entries shortly, but Skip and his book were worth a mention.

Underway and making way.

--- JKF

Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

If you’re reading this Blog, it’s a fair bet that you’re not lugging water from a well, that you’re not cowering in fear of a local militia, that you have monies sufficient to put food on the table, and that you have a roof overhead. Yes, some of you might be sick or without a job, I know that. Life is not an easy stretch of water, but if you’re reading this blog, I can darn well guarantee that you have plenty more to give thanks for than the majority of this world’s population.

I’m no bleeding heart, but if you consider yourself a “boater,” then life’s been ok to you. Being able to slip across the ocean’s surface on one’s own time and without being driven by the urgency of trying to land a meal, or fleeing a hostile coastline is amazing fortuity. You, my friend, have a lot to give thanks for in that alone.

I was going to try something clever like writing about the number of maritime cases that refer to Thanksgiving (31, if you’re interested), but my aim is not to entertain today. If I may suggest so, get off this damn computer, and go count your blessings.

Underway and making way.

--- JKF

Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

I'm not sure what a Tweet is all about. Don't get the wrong idea, I'm LinkedIn, I e-mail up a storm, and my web "presence" is decent. It's just that the idea of a steady stream of observations seems fatuous somehow. I guess thinking others want to know your randomness presumes something I don't like. For the now, I'll leave the Tweeting to the Hollywood crowd and bumble along, but in case things change I've had a go at a practice Tweet below. (For those non-Tweeters, it's short because you're only allowed 140 characters in each Tweet.)

Thx 4 cmg abrd.Jst rd nw law in NY.Ownr/optr plsr bts <21' incldg rwbts kyks canus only allow bt op if all abrd wearing PFD b/t 11/1 - 5/1.

Boy, the English language is going to die under this program, huh?

Underway and making way.

--- JKF

Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

I don’t know where time goes these days. If life was an old hull hanging in the Travelift straps, time would be pouring out of the seams and smattering all over the ground. Point being, with time passing by so fast, you try and grab those little moments to store away another good memory.

One of those little moments might be a boat charter while on holiday. You know the deal. Fourth day into a vacation and you're just beginning to realize there's a life outside of the daily grind. Tiring of the beach, you grab a family member or two and rent a boat to poke around the shoreline. So here's where this blog spots an issue for you. Those boat rental contracts with the age-old presentation on yellow paper can have some pretty scary terms and conditions. I'd say a prudent boater probably scoots the children outside and takes a moment to read that fine print. I'd say a prudent boater probably takes a few photographs of the boat before getting underway and maybe even checks the inventory aboard to make sure the boat's carrying what it's supposed to carry. All and all, taking the time to understand what's expected of you before you get underway makes good sense.

I keep parroting this, but there's no legal advice being given here. You do what you want, but at least be aware of the issue being spotted. Because, you know, for all time's fleet footedness, it sure can drag when you're dealing with something crappy like a claim for damage to a rental boat you're damn sure you didn't cause.

Underway and making way.

--- JKF

Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink

What happens when you write a cliff-hanger? You get comments likening your efforts to a soap opera. Well, sir, I challenge you to try and wring something interesting from this salt-cured subject that is the maritime law! Tough stuff. Enough though, let's look at what the Second Circuit just did . . .

Like any good soap opera, the plot requires a background story and, in this case, the New York financial world and something called an Electronic Funds Transfer fit the bill. Apparently, a very large percentage of the world's EFT's flow through New York so, say, you want to move money by wire transfer from somewhere foreign to somewhere even more foreign, that EFT's voyage may take it through New York.

Now, in the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Procedure, there is the infamous Rule B which allows for the pre-judgment (meaning before there is an outcome in the case) attachment and seizure of assets provided that the owner of the asset you intend to attach does not have a presence in the district where the asset is located. So let's say there's an arbitration in London against a charterer and let's say there's concern that a potential judgment against the charterer will be uncollectible because the charterer will simply fold up shop. What to do?

Voila, please welcome on stage, Rule B! You see, London counsel calls over to New York counsel and says: "Look here, chap. What we need is for you to seize a charterer's asset with that splendid Rule B thing you boys get to use." So, New York counsel gets an Order of Attachment from the Court, and trots it over to various banks for which charterer is know to use and . . .

Son of a gun, charterer unknowingly sends an EFT to its vendor in, say, Singapore and while en route it passes through New York and -- bingo -- the order of attachment grabs the EFT, bank rings New York counsel and says they're holding funds and charterer is scratching its head wondering what the hell just happened.

This was an increasingly popular legal avenue. Imagine in your mind's eye, the soap opera town with everybody merrily filing Rule B actions under blue skies and with plastic smiles. The camera angle changes to an interior view, doorbell chimes, and a smartly dressed maritime attorney, swings open his law firm's door. And who barges in? The Second Circuit, shoving the attorney aside and shouting: "We got it all wrong. You can't file these Rule B attachments. They're clogging up commerce. They're devaluing the dollar. No more, man! No more."

What you have here gives you the flavor of what the Second Circuit did. You can find the decision online (which is very readable and fairly interesting) if you search for its case name being Shipping Corp. of India v. Jaldhi, et al. More after the commercial break . . .

Underway and making way.

--- JKF

Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0) | Permalink