Here's what I did. I just checked our case law database to see what the most recent decision in the whole U.S. of A regarding an admiralty issue was about. Near as I can tell, Rodriguez v. Trump Casino decided by United States Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich on July 29, 2009 is as fresh as it gets.
Catherine Rodriguez was a dealer aboard a gaming boat owned by Trump Casino. While walking through a cafeteria at work, she allegedly fell and injured her ankle. Catherine sought remedies afforded to her as a maritime worker. The Court's opinion deals with a summary judgment motion whereby one party seeks to have the Court rule on an issue based on undisputed facts within the record.
Here, the summary judgment motion was seeking to dismiss Catherine's Jones Act claim, but it didn't work. (Ahh, the good 'ol Jones Act. See my June 2 and June 7 posts for a refresher on its workings.) The Court found that genuine issues of material fact existed precluding summary judgment. Practically speaking, this means that Catherine likely gets to put her case before the jury, but it doesn't mean she'll ultimately prevail.
In addition, the Magistrate Judge's opinion needs to be accepted by the District Judge and any party can file objections to the Magistrate Judge's opinion within ten days. What I'll do is keep an eye on Catherine's case and give you an update if I learn anything new.
Underway and making way.
--- JKF



Comments
Post has no comments.