Subscribe to RSS FeedWith morning coffee in hand, I was trawling recent New England court decisions looking to hook a maritime issue. Frankly, it was slim pickings until I ran across a fishermen's wage dispute. I'm always curious about the mechanics of other professions and this decision was sort of interesting for its background.
Three fishermen set sail aboard a scallop boat. Contrary to United States law, there was no written agreement memorializing the terms of their employment. It seemed that the voyage was successful and the boat returned to port with a mess of scallops that ultimately yielded a six-figure gross. The fishermen were each paid a portion of the boat's net proceeds. Well, a little while later the fishermen sued alleging various violations arising from the voyage including the lack of a written agreement. In addition to compensatory damages, the fishermen sought punitive damages for what was alleged to be egregious conduct.
The appellate court examined each of the issues and ultimately affirmed (meaning upheld) the lower court's decision which had awarded a very small adjustment to one of the fishermen and had rejected all the other claims. In connection with the punitive damages claim, the appellate court stated that the fish boat owner's violation of the statutory obligation to have a writing in place with the crew (the existence of which it was unaware) could not support such a claim. Specifically, the Court pointed out that the crew was paid under a lay-share system and that the violation was simply the lack of a fixed written employment contract.
The statute requiring, in some instances, that a written fishing agreement be in place before undertaking a voyage can be found at 46 U.S.C. § 10601.
--- JKF
Comments
Post has no comments.